58.
138
SQ
who placed the matter before me as Counsel and I then for the first time became acquainted with any of the particulars of this matter. The Dangure was still under attachment, the plaintiff still took no steps to prove his case, and an order on behalf of the defendant having after delay been obtained for changing the Attornies and served on the other side on the 8th March 1875, application was made for an order calling on the plaintiff to show cause why the two writs of attachment should not be set aside, this being the simplest method of objecting to the legality of the proceedings, or the defendant allowed to put in his answer. The Court gave leave to answer without prejudice to the defendants' right, and on the 16th of March the answer was served on the plaintiff's Attornies.
Upon the 25th of March the plaintiff gave notice to the defendant's Attornies to show cause why execution should not issue under the Order of the 6th of March 1874, to which the defendant's Attornies replied with a summons to be heard the same day for the plaintiff to show cause why the suit should not be set down for hearing.
Upon the two matters coming on upon the 8th April before both Judges, the plaintiff did not press his own motion and assented to the cause being set down for hearing, but stated that he would require a Commission to Paris to examine his agent Sehwoerer who had left the Colony in September, and an order was made to set down the cause for hearing without prejudice to the writs of attachment or to the defendant's rights, if any, as a Sovereign prince.
Upon
58.
138
SQ
who placed the matter before
me as Consel and I
then for the first time became acquainted with
any
soft
the particulars of this matter.
The Dangure
was still under attachment, the
plaintiff still took no steps to prove his ease, and an
Some
order on behalf of the defendant having after delay been oblamed for changing the Attornies and ---
other
served on the side on the 8th March 1875, application
Avad
at
on ec
made for
an
order.
• calling
on the plaintiff
to show cause
why the two writs of attachment
·
should not be set aside, this being the simplest method of objecting to the legality of the proceedings) or the defendant allowed to put in his answer. The Court
leave to answer without prejudice
to the defendants
and on the 16th of March the answer was served
gave
right
on
the plaintiffs Attornies.
Upon the 25th of March the plamtiff gave
why evention
to the defendant's Attornies to show cance
should not issue under the Order of the 6" of March
1874, to which the defendants Attornies replied with
a summons to be heard the same.
planitiff to show cause
be set down
for hearing.
day for the
why the suit should not
Upon the two matters coming
soming on upon the 8th
April before both Judges, the plaintiff did not
press his
own
motion and assented to the cause
being set down for hearing.
would require
but stated that he
a Commission to Paris to examine
his agent Sehwoerer who had left the Colony in September, and an order was made to set down
the canse for hearing without prejudice to the write of attachment or to the defendant's rights if any
as a
notice
Sovereign prince.
Mpon
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.